1 |
On 29/07/2022 13:06, Ionen Wolkens wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:30:20AM +0000, waebbl-gentoo@××××××.net wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 23:11:08 +0100 |
4 |
>> Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Up for grabs because of inactivity. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> dev-python/pyside2 has several open bugs and a version bump pending. |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> Needs some real love to tidy it up. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> Best, |
13 |
>>> sam |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Wouldn't it be applicable to put these packages under the umbrella of |
16 |
>> the Gentoo Qt project? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> It still need someone to maintain it either way, qt@ is rather small |
19 |
> and Qt6 is likely to use up people's time already. Being m-n at least |
20 |
> make its current state clear (up to qt@ though). |
21 |
> |
22 |
>> They're developed, published and hosted by the The Qt Company (in |
23 |
>> contrast for example to PyQt5 or QtPy) and are only python |
24 |
>> bindings for the Qt framework, although they're currently distributed |
25 |
>> in a separate tarball and not with the Qt tarball. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> On a side-note I'll be adding PyQt6 to the tree once I can[1], but I |
28 |
> don't use pyside for anything and probably won't be looking at pyside6. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> [1] https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/26504 |
31 |
|
32 |
I've added myself as the maintainer of shiboken2 and pyside2(-tools). I |
33 |
also added shiboken6 and pyside6(-tools) (masked for testing). |
34 |
Unfortunately the latter is stuck on python3_10 only at the moment, |
35 |
adding python3_11 to this is a whole new can of worms. |
36 |
|
37 |
Help with these packages is most welcome. They are notoriously difficult |
38 |
and fragile. |
39 |
|
40 |
Best regards, |
41 |
Andrew |