Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented?
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:33:14
Message-Id: 20070709232619.7d7052b5@snowflake
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented? by Zac Medico
1 On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:15:36 -0700
2 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
3 > Bug 174380 [1] has a growing list of features that may be included in
4 > EAPI-1. Some of the features are already implemented but can't be
5 > used in the portage tree until we do an EAPI bump. The ones that are
6 > currently implemented include slot deps [2] and iuse defaults [3].
7 > Are these features important enough to warrant an EAPI bump or should
8 > we wait for more features to materialize?
9
10 No point waiting when there're useful things that can be done straight
11 away. Slot deps at least meet that.
12
13 As for IUSE defaults... There were objections against that feature on
14 the grounds that it's unnecessary and increased maintenance. Do they
15 really offer any benefit over package.use?
16
17 --
18 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies