| 1 |
onsdag 11 september 2013 04.49.55 skrev Duncan: |
| 2 |
.... |
| 3 |
> (Tho jer points out that the parisc arch, among others, won't work with |
| 4 |
> that flag at all, and warns to that effect. So I guess the patch will |
| 5 |
> etiher be ifdeffed not to apply on such archs or will be conditionally |
| 6 |
> applied in the first place. The former is I believe preferred as |
| 7 |
> conditional patching is considered subpar.) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
We only enable -fstack-protector* if the arch is set in SSP_STABLE or |
| 10 |
SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE in the ebuild. For uclibc and ssp it need to be newer then |
| 11 |
.32 and have nptl enable. |
| 12 |
/Magnus |
Archives