Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Document optfeature suggests packages not installed
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 08:52:46
Message-Id: 20170930085236.GI10007@patriceclement.me
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Document optfeature suggests packages not installed by Chris Mayo
1 Hi Chris
2
3 Sunday 03 Sep 2017 16:56:08, Chris Mayo wrote :
4 > ---
5 > Please consider this clarification of optfeature.
6 >
7 > Chris
8 >
9 > eclass/eutils.eclass | 4 ++--
10 > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
11 >
12 > diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclass/eutils.eclass
13 > index fe4339f6b89..f35fa5980d7 100644
14 > --- a/eclass/eutils.eclass
15 > +++ b/eclass/eutils.eclass
16 > @@ -827,8 +827,8 @@ use_if_iuse() {
17 > # @FUNCTION: optfeature
18 > # @USAGE: <short description> <package atom to match> [other atoms]
19 > # @DESCRIPTION:
20 > -# Print out a message suggesting an optional package (or packages) which
21 > -# provide the described functionality
22 > +# Print out a message suggesting an optional package (or packages)
23 > +# not currently installed which provides the described functionality.
24 > #
25 > # The following snippet would suggest app-misc/foo for optional foo support,
26 > # app-misc/bar or app-misc/baz[bar] for optional bar support
27 > --
28 > 2.13.5
29 >
30 >
31
32 We (Michal Gorny and I) have reviewed your patch and merged it.
33
34 Thanks!
35
36 --
37 Patrice Clement
38 Gentoo Linux developer
39 http://www.gentoo.org