Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: octoploid <cryptooctoploid@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:21:26
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants by Mike Frysinger
Mike Frysinger <vapier <at>> writes:
> On Tuesday 06 December 2011 17:39:48 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i'll post binaries here: > > > > i've posted a stage3 tarball there now built with catalyst. if people want to > give it a spin and file bugs, that'd probably be cool. > > notes: > - don't waste time on stable packages ... your bugs will be rejected > - when filing new bugs, check the tracker first [1], and if it isn't already > listed, add your bug as a blocker of it > - the default build includes all 3 ABIs for gcc/glibc > - x32 is the default ABI
Nice. Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB barrier in the toolchain (e.g. Firefox LTO build), wouldn't it make sense to build gcc, binutils, as 64-bit LSB executables?


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>