| 1 |
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 07:13, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> anyone have any qualms with me changing the masking on glibc-2.3.2-r3 from |
| 3 |
> KEYWORDS="-*" to package.mask ? |
| 4 |
> ive been using it for quite sometime and was just about to update to NPTL-0.57 |
| 5 |
> (released like 2 days ago) when i realized i still inject the latest unstable |
| 6 |
> version of glibc so that my glibc's dont get screwed up ... i prefer to put |
| 7 |
> masked stuff in package.mask and then unmask in package.unmask ... |
| 8 |
> -mike |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
For core stuff, I especially recommend *not* using package.mask and |
| 11 |
using KEYWORDS="-*" instead. Otherwise weird things can happen in |
| 12 |
relation to the x86 and selinux profiles. package.mask doesn't work well |
| 13 |
for profiles that share the same masking keyword, particularly when you |
| 14 |
get around to removing the entry in package.mask. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Best Regards, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Daniel |
Archives