Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Joe Bormolini <lordjoe@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xawtv-3.78: Strange keyword
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 08:19:53
Message-Id: 20021108001914.25c48cee.lordjoe@speakeasy.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] xawtv-3.78: Strange keyword by Markus Wagner
1 I think it would be more important to fix bug #10238
2 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D10238) first... The xawtv 3.78
3 clobbers the user's fonts.alias in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc which
4 results in X not being able to startup because it can't find the
5 fixed-misc font. bad ju-ju, indeed. I'm guessing the -x86 is there so
6 people won't install it quite yet (from what Troy said about keywords),
7 but I'm not too clear on the new KEYWORDS business yet.
8
9 On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:54:52 +0100
10 Markus Wagner <mw@××××××××.de> wrote:
11
12 > Hi!
13 >
14 > Sorry Troy! I hit a the wrong button and sent this mail only to you.
15 > Now for all of you:
16 >
17 > On Friday 08 November 2002 02:44, Troy Dack wrote:
18 > > It's not a typo. It's part of the new portage stable/unstable
19 > [---snip---]
20 > > See the second item on the front page at www.gentoo.org
21 >
22 > I thougt something like this but I was not sure about it.
23 >
24 > I included "-x86" in my ACCEPT_KEYWORDS on my testing box and now
25 > "emerge -p world" returns following:
26 >
27 > emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy
28 > "=dev-java/java-sdk-docs-1.4.0*" (from ebuild /
29 > dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.1_rc1 merge) have been masked.
30 >
31 > Strange thing! But it's not so important. I'll remove the "-x86" fom
32 > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS and things work again...
33 >
34 > Thank you all!
35 >
36 > Markus
37 >
38 > --
39 > "Perfection is acheived not when there is nothing more to add, but
40 > rather when there is nothing more to take away." (Saint-Exupéry)
41 >
42 >
43 > --
44 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
45 >
46 >
47
48 --
49 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] xawtv-3.78: Strange keyword Paul de Vrieze <gentoo-user@××××××××.net>