| 1 |
On 09/08/03 Andy Arbon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Hello, |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Please see this command and it's output: |
| 9 |
> - ---------------------------------- |
| 10 |
> zoidberg ara # emerge -pU world |
| 11 |
> |>> --upgradeonly implies --update... adding --update to options. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Calculating world dependencies ...done! |
| 16 |
> [ebuild U ] sys-libs/db-4.0.14-r2 [3.2.9-r7] |
| 17 |
> [ebuild U ] net-misc/dhcpcd-1.3.22_p4-r1 [1.3.22_p4] |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Note this last line >| |
| 20 |
> [ebuild U ] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.4363-r3 [1.0.4496-r1] |
| 21 |
> - -------------------------------------------- |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Is this the correct behaviour? The nvidia-kernel ebuild was (most |
| 24 |
> likely) orignally installed from ~x86, though I normally stick to x86, |
| 25 |
> but even so, are there any situations where Portage should say it is |
| 26 |
> going to upgrade a package (not downgrade) to an ebuild with a lower |
| 27 |
> version number as indicated above? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Did you change kernels after installing nvidia-kernel? If yes it is a |
| 30 |
SLOT change and portage displays it as a upgrade. There are some patches |
| 31 |
in bugzilla to display these different from upgrades, I hope one of them |
| 32 |
gets incorporated into portage soon (SLOTs have more problems, but these |
| 33 |
need time). |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Marius |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 41 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives