| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2005-09-02 15:46:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> On Friday 02 September 2005 02:12 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> =gcc-3.4.3-r1 and <gcc-4* compiles and installs libffi seperately if |
| 8 |
>>> 'objc' is used (regardless of 'gcj', which always installs it); i.e. |
| 9 |
>>> the patch is already in there for that stated range of versions. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> lemme rephrase |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> what needs to happen in the gcc ebuilds so that we can punt the |
| 14 |
> libffi package |
| 15 |
> -mike |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ahh. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Assuming we don't care about gcc-4, for the meanwhile: |
| 20 |
- - figure out a backport of |
| 21 |
${PORTDIR}/sys-devel/gcc/files/3.4.3/libffi-without-libgcj.patch for |
| 22 |
gcc-3.3 series |
| 23 |
- --+ Maybe do some more QA concerning where libs get installed; IIRC, |
| 24 |
${PORTDIR}/sys-devel/gcc/files/3.4.3/libffi-nogcj-lib-path-fix.patch |
| 25 |
was an attempt to fix up some mis-path issues with the first patch on |
| 26 |
some systems (amd64) |
| 27 |
- - remove triggering the above patch on 'objc' USE flag (which was |
| 28 |
never really correct, but "pragmatic") |
| 29 |
- - add 'libffi' USE flag to trigger the above patches (if 'gcj' is not |
| 30 |
on...) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
__armando |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 37 |
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
iD8DBQFDGLflwgiTPLI9xhcRAhyaAJkBnhq23T3HTPaj7FH5N0vgJ5957wCgruWD |
| 40 |
ilY6ErNrbd2M1QHnnEtFPQ8= |
| 41 |
=aP1h |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives