Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman default | ||
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:55:46 | ||
| Message-Id: | 51C930DB.4020902@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] repoman default by Michael Sterrett |
||
| 1 | On 06/24/2013 10:40 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote: |
| 2 | > repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Does it make sense to have with ebuilds in the tree with unsatisfiable |
| 5 | dependencies? If so, should we distinguish between conditional and |
| 6 | unconditional dependencies? Note that if the dependencies are |
| 7 | conditional, you can already use package.use.mask to suppress the |
| 8 | repoman warnings. |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Thanks, |
| 11 | Zac |