| 1 |
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:03:02 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Given the vast number of possible choices to consider when defining |
| 4 |
> new PROPERTIES values [1], perhaps we should create a ballot and |
| 5 |
> hold a vote on definitions that people have submitted. I suppose |
| 6 |
> that voters would be able to vote yes or no on each proposed |
| 7 |
> property definition and they would also be able to write in one or |
| 8 |
> more alternative names for the definition. I don't know what the |
| 9 |
> best method(s) to carry out a vote like this would be. Does anybody |
| 10 |
> have any suggestions? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
What's wrong with just discussing it until we agree? Why do you think a |
| 13 |
compromise is necessary? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives