Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Commercial" software in portage
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:09:28
Message-Id: 200509240006.03727.jstubbs@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Commercial" software in portage by Brian Harring
1 On Friday 23 September 2005 23:42, Brian Harring wrote:
2 > GLEP23's accept_license is (for me) the preferred solution; you have
3 > everything locally, the choice of what you use is yours (rather then a
4 > default upstream with a secondary repo of commercial).
5
6 It doesn't fully cover what's being discussed here.
7
8 $ grep LICENSE doom3-1.3.1302.ebuild
9 LICENSE="DOOM3"
10 $ grep LICENSE doom3-demo-1.1.1286.ebuild
11 LICENSE="DOOM3"
12
13 The first is what's under discussion. The second isn't.
14
15 --
16 Jason Stubbs