1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Saturday 22 May 2004 00:39, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
5 |
> The idea that every package needs a maintainer has little to do with |
6 |
> Debian, and more to do with the fact that having accountability in one's |
7 |
> actions tends to leave people more honest. It also tends to improve |
8 |
> quality, since the person who added the ebuild will be held accountable |
9 |
> for what the ebuild does to a user's system. The solution to the |
10 |
> "single developer" problem is the Gentoo herd system. There are usually |
11 |
> multiple developers responsible for a single ebuild/set of ebuilds, |
12 |
> rather than a single person. |
13 |
|
14 |
Well said. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Once again, active participation helps much more with Gentoo than any |
17 |
> amount of talk. When users ask, we listen. The more users that request |
18 |
> something, the greater the chances of us doing it. It all boils down to |
19 |
> there being only a limited number of developers and a limited number of |
20 |
> hours in the day. We have to prioritize. A flaw in kde-libs is |
21 |
> probably going to get higher priority than an ebuild for a new |
22 |
> lm-sensors front-end for XFCE, simply due to the numbers affected. |
23 |
|
24 |
And those reading the above, remember that it is still volunteer work. The |
25 |
reason that whatever gets higher priority is due to the pride that each |
26 |
developer takes in their work. Something to think about... |
27 |
|
28 |
Regards, |
29 |
Jason Stubbs |
30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
31 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
32 |
|
33 |
iQCVAwUBQK4jX1oikN4/5jfsAQK3rAP+I4ofqGvUX7kjvDDG6dXuFI36swOl2Nqv |
34 |
noi4Mow4Nv2psws0//ZqSl6oSJc/O+cQRkg2MkpTa0Jtv2paVHa7YDoxmurVX6Nw |
35 |
/4+vVUmQVzour6Q+iq4Hjt2rit7HQgHFckcxbkw1/exMSRx3sVlfhIkCZeFMSBn8 |
36 |
8vuciYzoRe8= |
37 |
=EluC |
38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |