| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 08:07 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 07:54, Alin Nastac wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
| 4 |
> > >On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 06:34, Alin Nastac wrote: |
| 5 |
> > >>IMO, www-proxy should be renamed to net-proxy, for allowing me to move |
| 6 |
> > >>various SOCKS packages into it. |
| 7 |
> > >>The packages qualified for moving are: |
| 8 |
> > >> - net-misc/3proxy |
| 9 |
> > >> - net-misc/dante |
| 10 |
> > >> - net-misc/nylon |
| 11 |
> > >> - net-misc/tsocks |
| 12 |
> > >> |
| 13 |
> > >>I also think now is the time for creating another category containing |
| 14 |
> > >>all types of tunnels found in net-misc |
| 15 |
> > >> |
| 16 |
> > >>Thoughts? |
| 17 |
> > > |
| 18 |
> > >Leave as is. Read the metadata.xml for www-proxy: |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > The www-proxy category contains network proxy software. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > I am aware of that. However, in the event I move socks to this category, |
| 23 |
> > the name is misleading. I will not move 'em unless the name is changed. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Just because the category is prefixed with 'www' ? That's silly (imo), but |
| 26 |
> hey, it's your choice... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I wouldn't search for socks proxy software in a www category either. |
| 29 |
net-proxy sounds much more appealing. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
(o_ Markus Nigbur |
| 33 |
//\ Gentoo GNU/Linux Developer |
| 34 |
[ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org |
| 35 |
GPG Fingerprint: 9E31 187A 6C78 210C F248 EDBB F2FB A77F 707D F8C1 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives