From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Behaving productively on the list | ||
Date: | Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:27:09 | ||
Message-Id: | 53D4F00B.6040705@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Behaving productively on the list by "Andreas K. Huettel" |
1 | Andreas K. Huettel: |
2 | > Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2014, 14:04:00 schrieb hasufell: |
3 | >>>> I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support |
4 | >>>> on most of those converted ebuilds. |
5 | >>> |
6 | >>> PLEASE, everyone, don't just make statements like the the one above ^ but |
7 | >>> instead explain what has happened and best bring up a real-world example. |
8 | >>> |
9 | >>> "... of those converted ebuilds, because ....! |
10 | >>> For example, see ... which you just changed as follows: ... This has the |
11 | >>> consequence that ..." |
12 | >>> |
13 | >>> This will hopefully also cut down the pointless chatter "Yes you do. No |
14 | >>> you dont." |
15 | >> |
16 | >> This is getting really silly. It was explained ~5 times in this thread |
17 | >> and the explanation was linked 2+ times here. Yet no one cares to read |
18 | >> up on the issue. |
19 | > |
20 | > Link to it again. It costs you 10sec at most. You make your point much more |
21 | > clearly. |
22 | > |
23 | > Also, the examples do help. |
24 | > |
25 | |
26 | http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92053 |
27 | http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92055 |
28 | http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92043 |
29 | http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92138 |
30 | http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92259 |
31 | |
32 | I think that's enough for now. And it cost me a few minutes to go |
33 | through the thread which is what people should do when they respond here. |