| 1 |
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 2:17 PM, C Bergström <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> What I personally prefer is a rebase workflow. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The recommendation is to rebase when practical. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Rebasing makes the history look clean, but it sometimes does this by |
| 8 |
obscuring the real history. It also discards original author commits |
| 9 |
with their signatures and rewrites them without signatures (in theory |
| 10 |
it could add new signatures if the person doing the rebase is the |
| 11 |
author). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Rich |
Archives