Archives
Archives
| From: | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The Python problem | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:01:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | BANLkTiny_cbm51YVx15kZJuYwvBznBgY9Q@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The Python problem by "Petteri Räty" |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 17:53, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > I like the ruby approach for the reason that it doesn't require users to |
| 3 | > run update scripts like python-updater. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Sure, but if that means the developers now have to bump every package |
| 6 | in the tree when a new version of Python comes out, I'm not sure |
| 7 | that's the best trade-off. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Cheers, |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Dirkjan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The Python problem | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The Python problem | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |