From: | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | ||
Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:38:25 | ||
Message-Id: | 45A4F98C.6010105@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT by Mike Frysinger |
1 | Mike Frysinger napsal(a): |
2 | > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 03:40, Jakub Moc wrote: |
3 | > if you're categorizing those as "commercial broken stuff" you might want to |
4 | > look up the word "commercial" |
5 | |
6 | Huh? I was referring to this link [1] on Bug 161045 (which presumably |
7 | started this whole debate) |
8 | |
9 | [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-user-de&m=115148403700916&w=2 |
10 | |
11 | The gcl borkage is your job [2] and you might want to finally revert |
12 | your broken commit: |
13 | |
14 | [2] |
15 | http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-lisp/gcl/gcl-2.6.7-r2.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | -- |
19 | Best regards, |
20 | |
21 | Jakub Moc |
22 | mailto:jakub@g.o |
23 | GPG signature: |
24 | http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
25 | Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
26 | |
27 | ... still no signature ;) |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |