| 1 |
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 13:25 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:04:41 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Homer Parker <hparker@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Damnit, let the user shoot themself in the foot but let them |
| 5 |
> > learn from it. Remember back in the day when you had no clue? You |
| 6 |
> > learned from it. You can only protect them so much. If they want to |
| 7 |
> > use custom patches then they need to learn how. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> That's not the issue. The issue is advertising a user patches feature |
| 10 |
> when there's no way for the user to know up-front whether or not their |
| 11 |
> patches will be applied. This whole discussion started because user |
| 12 |
> patches are currently randomly ignored sometimes. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I guess I missed it's not a global feature, sorry. That said, |
| 16 |
everything else stands. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Homer Parker <hparker@g.o> |
Archives