Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>
To: Steven Elling <ellings@×××××.com>
Cc: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout redefines /etc/fstab
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 07:52:24
Message-Id: 1076226771.6996.16.camel@nosferatu.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout redefines /etc/fstab by Steven Elling
1 On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 06:06, Steven Elling wrote:
2 > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:48, purslow@×××××××××.ca wrote:
3 > > recently, i re-emerged 'baselayout',
4 > > which caused a set of candidates to be created for 'etc-update'.
5 > > most were innocuous or easily understood,
6 > > but one was for /etc/fstab , which seems both dangerous & unjustified.
7 >
8 > I agree!
9 >
10 > This has been brought to the attention of the devs already, discussed at
11 > length, debated at length, and eventually ignored as if it is not a
12 > problem.
13 >
14
15 Bug #? Anyhow, it have not changed since November last year ...
16
17
18 --
19
20 Martin Schlemmer
21 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
22 Cape Town, South Africa

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature