| 1 |
Le 09/03/2009 02:50, Donnie Berkholz a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On 14:09 Tue 03 Mar , Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Tuesday 03 March 2009 12:13:34 Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 4 |
>>>>>> Could you just use dosed here? |
| 5 |
>>>> dosed needs to die. |
| 6 |
>>> Why? |
| 7 |
>> Because it's utterly pointless and exists only for legacy reasons. Few |
| 8 |
>> packages use it anyway. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I did a quick check to look at the data supporting your point and found |
| 11 |
> 120 packages using it. I guess that qualifies as "few" when compared to |
| 12 |
> the whole tree. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Doing a bit of a cross thread thing here: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
How about getting rid of dosed in EAPI=3 ? Sounds like the perfect time |
| 17 |
to do it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Rémi |
Archives