Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@×××××××××××××××××××.net>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] wxGTK {up|down}grade loop
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 06:02:13
Message-Id: 3F9CB4B2.7000705@technaut.darktalker.net
1 I wouldn't recommend this approach. This will probably break whatever package depends on
2 the older version of the flip-flopping package.
3
4 Paul Fraser wrote:
5 > You could use emerge -UDp instead, which will tell Portage to ignore any downgrades that may occur, and only show packages that will actually be updated.
6 >
7 > On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 12:58:28PM -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
8 >
9 >>Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
10 >>
11 >>>Ok, here's what's bugging me lately:
12 >>>
13 >>> ruben@neferteti ruben $ emerge -uDp world
14 >>>
15 >>> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
16 >>>
17 >>> Calculating world dependencies ...done!
18 >>> [ebuild U ] x11-libs/wxGTK-2.4.1-r1 [2.4.0]
19 >>>
20 >>>After updating wxGTK, i stumble upon this:
21 >>>
22 >>> neferteti ruben # emerge -uDp world
23 >>>
24 >>> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
25 >>>
26 >>> Calculating world dependencies ...done!
27 >>> [ebuild UD] x11-libs/wxGTK-2.4.0 [2.4.1-r1]
28 >>>
29 >>>Something tells me this ain't normal behaviour :)
30 >>
31 >>I've seen this kind of thing a few times before, most notably with avifile
32 >>and drip. In this case, there is an update available for wxGTK, so portage
33 >>upgrades it. Unfortunately, there is some program installed that requires
34 >>on a version of wxGTK <=2.4.0, so portage downgrades it to not break the
35 >>other program. I consider this behavior a portage bug, but as far as I
36 >>know, there is currently no easy way to prevent this from happening.
37 >>
38 >>--
39 >>Andrew Gaffney
40 >>
41 >>
42 >>--
43 >>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
44 >
45 >
46
47
48 --
49 Andrew Gaffney
50
51
52 --
53 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list