| 1 |
hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> No bump is better than a shitty bump imo. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I agree, but I think the problem is basically that many people |
| 5 |
consider it impossible for "newer" to ever be shitty. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Even if they are intimately familiar with the details of a package |
| 8 |
upstream they may still not be capable of determining what is shitty |
| 9 |
in the context of a distribution. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I guess most stabilization requesters as well as actual stabilizers |
| 12 |
are even less familiar with upstream details, so determining what is |
| 13 |
shitty and not is really hard.. :\ |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
//Peter |
Archives