1 |
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 13:25, Jason Cooper wrote: |
2 |
> If this has been mentioned before, please ignore. I emerged |
3 |
> linux-2.4.21_rc8-gss a week or so ago and finally got around to |
4 |
> compiling it (need crypto to access old HD). Found the following error: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> on line 922 of kernel/sched.c there is a redefinition of |
7 |
> set_cpus_allowed(). It would appear to be the result of a ill-behaved |
8 |
> patch as it is an exact copy of the definition below it. All that was |
9 |
> necessary was to delete the offending function (including |
10 |
> #if CONFIG_SMP |
11 |
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I would submit a patch, but it doesn't seem right to patch over a |
14 |
> patch? :) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Again, if this is known, please ignore. If you need more info, please |
17 |
> let me know. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Thanks for putting out an awsome distro. |
20 |
|
21 |
The best way to take care fo this would be to file a bug on |
22 |
bugs.gentoo.org and assign it to x86-kernel@g.o. That way the |
23 |
kernel team will get the bug and have tracking information on it and |
24 |
also an easy way to contact you and collaborate on the problem. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Chris Gianelloni |
28 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
29 |
Games Team |
30 |
|
31 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |