| 1 |
On 13 Jun 2008, at 12:18, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 2 |
> "We're writing a spec that's somewhat like Portage, but where it |
| 3 |
> breaks Paludis, we prefer to get Portage to change it's behaviour |
| 4 |
> instead. Don't crib about this however. We could just have easily have |
| 5 |
> created a whole new spec which broke Portage completely." |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Care to give an example instead of FUDing? Paludis is written to match |
| 8 |
PMS, not the other way around. And when PMS changes, Paludis is |
| 9 |
changed to reflect such changes. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Don't be childish. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
- ferdy |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives