From: | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative | ||
Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:48:32 | ||
Message-Id: | 20100331194626.GG11663@hrair | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative by Alex Alexander |
1 | On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:49:26PM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote: |
2 | > VALID_USE does look a bit strange. |
3 | > |
4 | > how about |
5 | > IUSE_RULES |
6 | > or |
7 | > IUSE_RESTRICTIOMS |
8 | > or |
9 | > RUSE |
10 | > ? |
11 | It's not really IUSE; the constraints it specifies applies to USE |
12 | only. |
13 | |
14 | USE_STATES, VALID_USES, VALID_USE_STATES, ALLOWED_USE, etc. |
15 | |
16 | Actual name I don't hugely care about, I'm more interested in ensuring |
17 | we don't rule out doing use cycle breaking via a bad design decision. |
18 | |
19 | ~harring |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |