1 |
On 12/07/2022 13:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> to the commit message as a separate line. The sign-off must contain |
5 |
>>> -the committer's legal name as a natural person, i.e., the name that |
6 |
>>> -would appear in a government issued document. |
7 |
>>> +the committer's real name as a natural person, i.e., the name that |
8 |
>>> +you would use to present yourself to your colleagues. |
9 |
> |
10 |
>> This is insensitive to people who don't have any colleagues. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The snarkiness of Michał's comment left aside, in general "the name that |
13 |
> you would use to present yourself to your colleagues" won't work. It is |
14 |
> one of the examples in [1]: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> | 4. People have, at this point in time, one full name which they go by. |
17 |
> | Not so, even in Western countries, where a woman may choose to retain |
18 |
> | her unmarried name at work (where she is already known by that name), |
19 |
> | and use her husband’s surname on social occasions, and even on legal |
20 |
> | documents such as mortgages and loans. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> (IIRC, robbat2 had once pointed me to that document, in the context of |
23 |
> a contributor from South India with a single-letter name.) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Ulrich |
26 |
> |
27 |
> [1] https://shinesolutions.com/2018/01/08/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names-with-examples/ |
28 |
|
29 |
I think this is the third time we've had the "real name" vs "legal name" |
30 |
discussion. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. The "legal name" |
31 |
rule, as it is worded now, has no basis in reality. We do not enforce |
32 |
this, nor could we if we wanted to (unless of course we start requiring |
33 |
scans of e.g. drivers licenses before we accept contributions to Gentoo, |
34 |
which would be stupid). Truth is there is no way for any of us to know |
35 |
if the names we see and use in Gentoo are a persons "legal name". |
36 |
|
37 |
Anna's wording is better, if only for the reason that it reflects |
38 |
reality better. In practice, all we actually do is apply our |
39 |
(unavoidably) biased 'common sense' to determine if some combination of |
40 |
symbols is, or could be, a "real name". And this is good enough because |
41 |
all we really need is some convenient semi-unique identifier to refer to |
42 |
a person in order to contact them, and to determine who is responsible |
43 |
for what. If "real name" is good enough for Linux why wouldn't it be |
44 |
good enough for us? |
45 |
|
46 |
Best regards, |
47 |
Andrew |