| 1 |
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:29:08AM -0500, thus spake Matthew Kennedy: |
| 2 |
> Other issues asside, generally it's better to modify the build process |
| 3 |
> than to disable the sandbox. This might involve reading through Makefile |
| 4 |
> or Makefile.in for the software in question. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
First of all, thanks to all who replied to my original question, thanks |
| 7 |
again for all the pointers to documentation and appropriate manpages, and |
| 8 |
thanks for the generated discussion. Through all of this I was able to |
| 9 |
determine that my sandbox issue had to do with the fact that I had not |
| 10 |
included ${D} in front of all of my entries in the "make install" process. |
| 11 |
Once that was done, all went smoothly. Thanks once again for all of the |
| 12 |
help! Now it's oin to trying to get dsniff and fragroute ebuilds done. |
| 13 |
Anybody want to help? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
geoffrey |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
| 18 |
Santa Claus, |
| 19 |
the Tooth Fairy, |
| 20 |
Windows 2000 ... |
| 21 |
Some things you just outgrow. |
| 22 |
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
Archives