| 1 |
On 8/11/20 11:36 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote: |
| 2 |
> And I've already provided you one use case where udev doesn't work well |
| 3 |
> but eudev does. I've also mentioned some historic issues I believe |
| 4 |
> should already be fixed but which did bit me in systemd-udev which was |
| 5 |
> never a problem in eudev. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
Your systems seem to diverge a lot from what I'd consider as 'default'. |
| 8 |
You must already make many changes to them. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Before this thread I didn't even know/remember I was using eudev. It |
| 11 |
works and there doesn't seem to be any global issues related to it. |
| 12 |
However after reading this thread I'm a bit considered about the |
| 13 |
maintenance state of it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Switched to udev. Simple as 'emerge -1 sys-fs/udev'. It works, didn't |
| 16 |
notice any difference. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If musl is a problem, to my knowledge musl has its own stage images, so |
| 19 |
why can't those stages use eudev while other ones defaulting to udev? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- juippis |
Archives