1 |
On 28 March 2012 20:46, Alex Alexander <wired@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> For example, my /usr/portage/ on this system looks like this: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> portage/ |
5 |
> tree/ |
6 |
> profiles/ -> tree/profiles/ |
7 |
> distfiles/ |
8 |
> packages/ |
9 |
> layman/ |
10 |
> |
11 |
> it is a big improvement over the current |
12 |
> distfiles-and-packages-mixed-with-tree-while-layman-wanders state :) |
13 |
> -- |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
I'd rather the gentoo tree be classed as the same tier as other |
17 |
sources, ie, more like: |
18 |
|
19 |
> portage/ |
20 |
> profiles/ -> repositories/gentoo/profiles/ |
21 |
> distfiles/ |
22 |
> packages/ |
23 |
> repositories/gentoo/ |
24 |
> repositories/sunrise/ |
25 |
|
26 |
At least that way the notion of overlays is less of a "3rd class |
27 |
citzens, filth, scum" comparison., and ::gentoo being the "master |
28 |
repository" is just a configuration convention, not something that is |
29 |
a fixed design constraint. |
30 |
|
31 |
Fwiw, I've also long despised the layout of the distfiles directory |
32 |
being a flat hierarchy, it makes the directory a festering pit of |
33 |
hellspawn over time on any filesystem that doesn't have dirindex. ( |
34 |
I've seriously had "ls" take up to a minute to run in that directory, |
35 |
and if I've ever made the mistake of trying to tab compete something |
36 |
in there .... /usr/portage/distfiles/foo<tab> is my normal muscle |
37 |
memory response, and then it sits there doing nothing for a minute and |
38 |
it would have been faster to just finish typing it myself =_= ) |
39 |
|
40 |
Though I don't have any solution better than a "break it into 26 |
41 |
subdirs by first letter" . |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Kent |
46 |
|
47 |
perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
48 |
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
49 |
|
50 |
http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |