| 1 |
On 03/03/2010 02:58 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
>> Dne 3.3.2010 12:32, Joshua Saddler napsal(a): |
| 3 |
>>> On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:35:10 +0200 |
| 4 |
>>> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> # Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> (03 Mar 2010) |
| 7 |
>>>> # Masked for QA, security |
| 8 |
>>>> # |
| 9 |
>>>> # Internal copies of vuln. zlib, jpeg, speex and likely |
| 10 |
>>>> # others |
| 11 |
>>>> # |
| 12 |
>>>> # http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255453 |
| 13 |
>>>> # |
| 14 |
>>>> # Masked for removal in 60 days. |
| 15 |
>>>> games-fps/openarena |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> Why? Why did you ignore the patches posted to the bug? Even Diego, the original reporter, commented that the patches fix the problems.[1] |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255453#c4 |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> One of the reasons I left the treecleaner project was that it became apparent |
| 24 |
> that people were more interested in dumping packages with simple problems |
| 25 |
> than fixing them (which believe it or not, was what treecleaner was formed to |
| 26 |
> do). Now they call it QA. :) |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I'm all for dropping broken crap, but things people use with working patches |
| 29 |
> attached? QA is also about getting that stuff applied. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
And now you have good 60 days to apply and test the package, and |
| 32 |
co-ordinate it with upstream. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Don't forget to add yourself to metadata.xml, as it's a non-trivial task. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
;-) |
Archives