1 |
Anyone got any problems against an unmasking of libnet-1.1 from |
2 |
package.mask? An entry in package.mask was added for libnet-1.1 back in |
3 |
September 2002, and I'm not sure why. The reason for this is due to |
4 |
gcc-3.3, as libnet-1.0.2a has a multi-line string value in it's header |
5 |
file, and gcc-3.3 doesn't like such things very well. Unmasking 1.1 |
6 |
will move towards eliminating this glitch (although I have a patch for |
7 |
libnet-1.0.2a as well). |
8 |
|
9 |
Thoughts? |
10 |
|
11 |
--Kumba |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: |
15 |
small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are |
16 |
elsewhere." --Elrond |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |