1 |
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:08:38 +0300 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you |
4 |
> know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like regression from 0.1, speak |
5 |
> up now. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070 |
8 |
> |
9 |
> (I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.) |
10 |
|
11 |
FWIW, I have/had been running both netifrc-9999 and openrc-9999, along |
12 |
with udev-init-scripts-26-r2. However I quite recently switched to |
13 |
systemd for booting, so while they're still installed, I'm only using |
14 |
trivial bits of openrc now, and perhaps (?) non of netifrc, tho I guess |
15 |
I'm still using udev-init-scripts. |
16 |
|
17 |
I've seen no problems related to those packages here, either before or |
18 |
after I switched to systemd, save for the file-collisions that are the |
19 |
reason both netif and udev-init-scripts must stabilize together (as in |
20 |
the bug but not mentioned in your post.) |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
24 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
25 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |