Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 19:05:43
Message-Id: 566DC15E.6010002@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging by Andrew Savchenko
1 On 12/13/2015 07:50 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:38:55 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote:
5 >> On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
6 >>> So apparently we're signing things with gpg now
7 >> And a related question:
8 >>
9 >> How would I actually verify the signatures in a meaningful way?
10 > git log --show-signature does this using GnuPG.
11 That's not very automated or effective.
12 I'd assume 'emerge' has such functionality included ...?
13 >
14 > Of course, in order to gpg to work one have to mark dev keys as
15 > trusted, they can be verified using ldap or several public
16 > keyservers. LDAP is more reliable, of course, but this method works
17 > only for devs (and probably some stuff members) having an access
18 > here.
19 That's what the app-crypt/gkeys thing is for, as far as I can tell.