| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:29:22 -0400
|
| 5 |
Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> On Sunday 06 May 2007 4:22:44 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 8 |
> > On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:13:56 -0400 |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 11 |
> > > > So you want users to have to explicitly acknowledge all ewarn |
| 12 |
> > > > notices? Now *that*'s a way of making the system useless by |
| 13 |
> > > > overusing it. |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Err, warn notices are supposed to be important warnings. If they are |
| 16 |
> > > not it sounds like a good job for QA. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > That's a completely different degree of importance. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Sounds like its the right degree of importants for deprecated things upstream |
| 21 |
> to me. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Dan, Ciaran,
|
| 24 |
Perhaps I'll come across as a spoil sport here, but is there any
|
| 25 |
chance you could take your conversation to IRC (or to whatever)? It
|
| 26 |
would go faster, and if you can reach some common level of agreement,
|
| 27 |
then you can usefully post that to this list.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Regards.
|
| 34 |
- --
|
| 35 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
|
| 36 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)
|
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 38 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-ecc01.6 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iD8DBQFGPkM9Qa6M3+I///cRAi1mAKCjjlYDckKoENeGFLjLkaWwH1ynFQCgkOq/
|
| 41 |
+WdqXmqhJpbiuFFgEJQeSyI=
|
| 42 |
=zykl
|
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 44 |
éí¢‡^¾§¶Š(® šŠX§‚X¬ |
Archives