| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 08/16/2011 12:01 AM, Micha? Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Considering the number of different virtuals in this category, |
| 6 |
>>> maybe it would be a good idea to split it a little? What I'm |
| 7 |
>>> proposing is maybe creating some kind of '*-virtual' categories. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> For example, half of the current virtuals are prefixed with |
| 10 |
>>> 'perl-'. Maybe they could be transformed into 'perl-virtual/*'? |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> If you're going to do that, then I'd suggest giving them some sort |
| 13 |
>> of tag that the package manager can rely upon in order to identify |
| 14 |
>> them as virtuals. For example, we could have the ebuilds set |
| 15 |
>> PROPERTIES=virtual [2], or we could simply specify (in PMS) that |
| 16 |
>> any category whose name matches the '*-virtual' pattern will |
| 17 |
>> contain virtuals. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Doesn't DEFINED_PHASES==- serve that purpose nowadays? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Actually, since EAPI 4 we have default src_install, so it's possible to |
| 22 |
have ebuilds that have no defined phases but still install stuff. |
| 23 |
- -- |
| 24 |
Thanks, |
| 25 |
Zac |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk5KG7EACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOIeACfSLRu2svBgk3zYi+bBD7HI6hP |
| 31 |
cjcAoJ2vqzeyXza8+p4FTlvK/Wjt6HXv |
| 32 |
=KlFM |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives