| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 04/27/2011 06:14 PM, Eray Aslan wrote: |
| 5 |
> openssl ciphers -v 'ALL:@STRENGTH' |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I find it somewhat hard to believe that they are using a version of |
| 8 |
OpenSSL that doesn't have AES-256. It's been around since 0.9.7. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Having said that, I don't know of any major weakness with the cipher. |
| 11 |
The only thing I don't personally really love about it is the lack of |
| 12 |
analysis. Something like AES has been the majority of the fields notice |
| 13 |
and gets more attention, so it is likely better analyzed and understood. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Regards, |
| 16 |
- -- |
| 17 |
Dane Smith (c1pher) |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 |
| 19 |
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNuWgfAAoJEEsurZwMLhUx1c0P/RVO1g0Ph9zl6YmlLHwJVH/h |
| 25 |
RrAN/OdSQRoefGrSEuzKGQJtegmvNakzc4+YOxPsM8nXg2bBBokxkm2smr2H9YQ1 |
| 26 |
07Gf6kgLw7ZmPzy5sVPDaqd3Y6P9PQa9rvwwejX4XvQZAtFRC/jljPk1qLUutxte |
| 27 |
vCdlHQUl2cpV01qzFDtm+YRThPqTSA91Ecrq3yaqZn9mtPmcKjS5uz4eUPSJrepm |
| 28 |
xDnXUeCstgEADcjgVA2ofshpdrBLKNcePQQ/FDOuGXkGeQM70CO+U4Yekhe7fvF6 |
| 29 |
tEK7QomLxPOvTz2OZsSQErmXhysfHHBEM/uo1Mxnk4zkGZzBpexGsEhkPESsTkVR |
| 30 |
k8wiwQvLacr+NslDNRAa1c08HU+j6JcvjTbcq8shMD8PvsmS+I3TbUEZsVOBGe6E |
| 31 |
kMxG+zwWD3LmXSZCvrUtQeBN+aLpRpa5cibGIgYZtoYe9miT2LW3D1UmvzYNvlZA |
| 32 |
0QW0zEOrxrBgHdxBBOgZLN+hCZUaMoAfi0m7AMqFczmyulXsER/ROFsCZmLhzKPK |
| 33 |
yK9Y3kAAU7Y0aOjVhwqU4JKuyPvho0SntpRZGSCIXPMncySb163CkeecJ1to8+1O |
| 34 |
IN5rY4O9jFMWDHNFz7NMSD6Hnk4zoem6b/+v6qYoT6uHx3sYT/C7l3E0OJ2B7SI/ |
| 35 |
tXeYUYa/mR49AszHpaes |
| 36 |
=lpeo |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives