| 1 |
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:15 PM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> What I wanted to avoid was something I encountered on the GCC mailing |
| 3 |
> list: When I asked why GCJ was removed, I was told that it was hard to |
| 4 |
> maintain. When I asked for an example of past maintenance issues (and |
| 5 |
> made it clear I had no interest in disputing whether the issues were |
| 6 |
> valid or not) I received no reply from the maintainer except his |
| 7 |
> original answer, leaving me to wonder whether GCJ was actually hard to |
| 8 |
> maintain. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I have seen similar exchanges associated with other projects. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
When you have no standing in the project, there's little incentive to |
| 13 |
justify one's actions and decisions to you. |
Archives