1 |
Hey all, |
2 |
|
3 |
I have been advised to bring this topic back to the list before taking |
4 |
any action, so here it is. |
5 |
|
6 |
First, I need to clarify what I'm *NOT* talking about. |
7 |
|
8 |
This discussion has nothing to do with whether or not you have the |
9 |
split-usr use flag turned on; all of us officially have that on because |
10 |
/bin, /lib* and /sbin are directories in the official Gentoo setup. In |
11 |
other words, I am *not* talking about forcing the /usr merge. |
12 |
|
13 |
Unfortunately, the concept of separate usr has gotten wrapped up in the |
14 |
split-usr use flag and doesn't have to be. For the record, I mean something |
15 |
very specific when I say "separate usr". I am talking about the situation |
16 |
where /usr is a mount point separate from /, so in this thread, let's stick |
17 |
to "separate usr" for that situation. I am *not* even saying that using |
18 |
separate usr is wrong or unsupported. You can even run separate usr with |
19 |
split-usr turned off if you would like to do so. |
20 |
|
21 |
Now for the use case I want to talk about, and that is using separate |
22 |
/usr without using an initramfs to boot your system and pre-mount /usr. |
23 |
|
24 |
If you do this, many things are broken, and this is why the binary |
25 |
distros all use an initramfs if you do this. This configuration is also |
26 |
unsupported officially in Gentoo [1] [2], and it is not shown as the |
27 |
example setup in our handbook. |
28 |
|
29 |
I want to hear from people who have / and /usr on separate partitions |
30 |
and who are not using an initramfs. |
31 |
|
32 |
If you are in this group, I have a very specific question. Why aren't |
33 |
you using an initramfs? |
34 |
|
35 |
Thanks, |
36 |
|
37 |
William |
38 |
|
39 |
[1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20130924-summary.txt |
40 |
[2] https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/gentoo-news.git/commit/?id=a79dd69b0cca439bc0c483c9193c79e0554819d0 |