1 |
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
2 |
> On 2007/07/10, Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > - we could finally kick all the no* USE flags. USE flags are use |
4 |
> > flags - they determine what should be used. not what should not be |
5 |
> > used... |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Because of the way USE flags stack in Portage (the USE_ORDER variable), |
8 |
> IUSE defaults are not a solution for dropping no* flags: |
9 |
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/43137/focus=43175 |
10 |
> As Zac pointed out in his reply to this post, dropping nocxx and |
11 |
> friends is more a job for use.force / package.use.force. |
12 |
|
13 |
the no* flags were introduced more to address default behavior than the -* |
14 |
case, so yes we can kick many of the no* USE flags |
15 |
|
16 |
also, use.force isnt exactly a nice solution ... more like brute force, i'm |
17 |
not sure any no* flag would be appropriate |
18 |
-mike |