| 1 |
Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:49:38 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:26:19 +0100 |
| 6 |
>> "Wulf C. Krueger" <philantrop@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> No, we didn't because the whole thing is p.masked for a reason. |
| 9 |
>>> It, KDE 4.0.1, is broken crap that should not yet be re-keyworded. |
| 10 |
>> OK then. and I am not going to cross-post this to -dev@, btw: why the |
| 11 |
>> hell did you decide to put broken crap in the tree? It should never |
| 12 |
>> have left your repository, it seems. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The follow-up question, by the way, is even better, or it's answer |
| 15 |
> should be: if the description of KDE teams keyword dropping policy on |
| 16 |
> bug #209418 is anything to go by, the keywords for x86 and amd64 should |
| 17 |
> have been dropped as well, or testing passed miraculously for these |
| 18 |
> arches despite KDE 4.0.1 being broken crap. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
These would be the architectures they have access to and are using to do the |
| 21 |
development work on these ebuilds, getting them to the point where ready for |
| 22 |
evaluation by those on other architectures. Just like when you add a new |
| 23 |
ebuild, you add it with the keywords for architectures you personally have |
| 24 |
verified to work. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 29 |
mips, treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 30 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives