| 1 |
Hi Michał,
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> writes:
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
>> [...] |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Unfortunately, this ended up pretty bothersome to maintain. Besides |
| 8 |
>> making ebuilds quite complex (and prone to mistakes), I'm hearing more |
| 9 |
>> and more reports of programs being broken through getting multiple LLVM |
| 10 |
>> versions in the link chain. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> This is not something that can be easily solved. In other words, it's |
| 13 |
>> a mess and I don't think we're really getting anywhere. For this |
| 14 |
>> reason, I'm considering dropping slotting and going back to permitting |
| 15 |
>> only a single version of LLVM and Clang being installed. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> [...] |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I've got the message and slotted LLVM and Clang are going to stay for |
| 20 |
> the time being. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thank you! I appreciate your decision. From the discussions of this
|
| 23 |
thread, the quality and SLOTing of llvm is a killing feature of Gentoo.
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Shall we open a tracker bug to put together the linkage bugs? We might
|
| 26 |
gain some inspirations from the global picture.
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Yours,
|
| 29 |
Benda |
Archives