1 |
Ciao, |
2 |
|
3 |
The treecleaner project held a meeting today on IRC (#gentoo-treecleaners |
4 |
on Freenode, log attached) to discuss the goals of the project, why it |
5 |
was frozen and ways in which to improve the process - treecleaning |
6 |
without a vengence, maybe? ;) |
7 |
|
8 |
The outcome of the meeting is, basically, that we need to be a lot more |
9 |
careful/cautious when it comes to punting packages from the tree. For |
10 |
example, in cases where packages work but the ebuilds themselves do not, |
11 |
we should fixing those up where possible. Same goes for packages that |
12 |
are widely used e.g., XMMS (that one just came into my head, honest!). |
13 |
|
14 |
In addition to this, we'll also be following a process similar to that |
15 |
used by the security team: file a bug (assigned to maintainer-needed |
16 |
with treecleaners on the CC) detailing why exactly package foo should be |
17 |
masked/removed; X yes votes from treecleaner members will result in the |
18 |
package getting package.mask-ed and/or removed from the tree. |
19 |
|
20 |
That about sums it up; see the attached log if anything is unclear, or |
21 |
reply to this mail. :) |
22 |
|
23 |
Best, |
24 |
Treecleaner team |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Elfyn McBratney, |
28 |
Gentoo Developer, |
29 |
Nutty between the hours of 3AM and 14AM... |
30 |
+----------------------------------+ |
31 |
| irc.freenode.net / beu | |
32 |
| beu [@] gentoo [.] org | |
33 |
+-------------------------- o.0 ---+ |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |