Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] flag-o-matic updates
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 01:58:47
1 ive just finished some updates to flag-o-matic functions so that they should
2 be more robust now ... however, a few flag usages in cvs are broken ... note
3 that they were broken before this update, i'm just giving people heads up for
4 future usage
6 before, people used to do this:
7 replace-flags k6 586
8 replace-flags k6-1 586
9 replace-flags k6-2 586
10 this was because k6 code generation was pretty bad with gcc-3.2.3 and earlier
11 (and i think 3.3.x has resolved most of them)
13 the way replace-flags (and well, all flag-o-matic functions) is to work off of
14 'flag atoms' ... that is, they dont match/replace partial flags (if they did,
15 this could lead to unforeseen behavior with users who use some really custom
16 flags)
18 so, to help out in general with replacing march/mcpu flags, ive added another
19 function, replace-cpu-flags
20 replace-cpu-flags 586 k6 k6-1 k6-2
21 this will replace all instances of -march=k6, -march=k6-1, and -march=k6-2
22 with -march=i586 and -mcpu=k6, -mcpu=k6-1, and -march=k6-2 with -mcpu=i586
23 -mike


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] flag-o-matic updates Jason Rhinelander <jason@××××××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] flag-o-matic updates "C. Brewer" <cbrewer@×××××××××××××.net>