| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 |
| On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 13:12 -0500, Colin Kingsley wrote: |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
|>What I gather from this thread is that not every mailing list is |
| 8 |
|>perfect, and not every mail client is perfect, so every now and then, |
| 9 |
|>somebody gets a duplicate mail. Not the end of the world. Get over it. |
| 10 |
| |
| 11 |
| |
| 12 |
| Yes, but when you deliberately have the EXACT SAME LIST in both the TO |
| 13 |
| and the CC field, it is really annoying and your own fault for causing |
| 14 |
| more list traffic. |
| 15 |
| |
| 16 |
| |
| 17 |
|>What I would like clarified is what is the propper address for gentoo |
| 18 |
|>mailing lists now? <list>@robin.gentoo.org, or <list>@gentoo.org. Or |
| 19 |
|>are both ok? |
| 20 |
| |
| 21 |
| |
| 22 |
| You can send to either one. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It's pretty clear that sending to something that abstracts the |
| 25 |
implementation (in this case, which box the lists are hosted on) is |
| 26 |
better -- therefore, either @lists.gentoo.org (does this exist?) or |
| 27 |
@gentoo.org, not @robin.gentoo.org. |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iD8DBQFCJjWsXVaO67S1rtsRAtSQAKCzdh193OhcAOHbVA9XbMKVLlVmJQCgjVy0 |
| 33 |
20hgATLrzUzZ3dAmg4v3yR0= |
| 34 |
=yRBt |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives