From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing | ||
Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:07:12 | ||
Message-Id: | 1358842021.2064.55.camel@belkin4 | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing by "Tomáš Chvátal" |
1 | El mar, 22-01-2013 a las 08:16 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió: |
2 | > 2013/1/21 Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>: |
3 | > > This can be useful when, for example, doc contents are modified. You can |
4 | > > then rely on using REPLACING_VERSIONS in your ebuild to print messages |
5 | > > when people updates from versions using old docs |
6 | > > |
7 | > > Patch to review attached |
8 | > > |
9 | > |
10 | > Would'nt be better to just set some variable in the ebuild, rather |
11 | > than call function that touches empty file? |
12 | > |
13 | > Tom |
14 | > |
15 | > |
16 | |
17 | I think it can be done in either way... but I don't see the advantage of |
18 | any over the other :/ |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing | "Tomáš Chvátal" <tomas.chvatal@×××××.com> |