From: | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild | ||
Date: | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:59:11 | ||
Message-Id: | 4E9629A7.3080405@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" |
1 | On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
2 | > Mike Frysinger schrieb: |
3 | >>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. |
4 | >> |
5 | >> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the tree |
6 | >> with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the depgraph. |
7 | > |
8 | > The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. |
9 | |
10 | I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |