| 1 |
On 10/04/2010 19:04, Vincent Launchbury wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 04/10/10 11:25, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Yes, it does. However, I would tend to question how practical their |
| 4 |
>> audio captcha is. Go to www.captcha.net and try the demo a few |
| 5 |
>> times and see how much luck you have solving audio captchas from it. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Just for reference, I tried 15 different sound clips and got 5 right. 9 |
| 8 |
> were completely incomprehensible, 1 was fuzzy, and the other 5 were |
| 9 |
> quite clear. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I'd agree that accessibility is important, but if a better solution |
| 12 |
> doesn't end up working out, ReCaptcha should at least provide access for |
| 13 |
> blind users, albeit inefficiently. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
I was just at Microsoft's site for the hotfix download to fix the |
| 16 |
Advanced Local Procedure Call problem in Server 2008R2 and you need to |
| 17 |
enter a captcha to get the link sent to your email address. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Just as I was about to enter it I thought I would listen to it just for |
| 20 |
the hell of it... I couldn't understand a thing, it sounded like two |
| 21 |
ferrets fighting infront of a de-tuned radio. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Whatever system the wiki and the forums have we better make it sure it |
| 24 |
is the right one because there would be nothing worse than going to a |
| 25 |
site and finding you can't use it because of a rubbish captcha system. |
Archives