| 1 |
On 10/1/13 7:13 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:14:29 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> What do you think? |
| 5 |
> I think that when you set out to help every minor architecture get |
| 6 |
> stable, you didn't know what you were getting into. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
+1 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think it's great to see your work there, Agostino. If I can have a |
| 11 |
suggestion though, I'd much rather see x86 and amd64 being done with |
| 12 |
thorough testing and other arches mostly on as needed / best effort |
| 13 |
basis (which doesn't mean less testing but basically larger delays would |
| 14 |
be acceptable - or not keeping as many packages in the stable tree, not |
| 15 |
sure how many people actually use them). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paweł |
Archives