| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 03/08/2014 02:56 PM, Alex Legler wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 08.03.2014 14:52, Alex Legler wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Also, I doubt we're recommending 1.9 over 2.0 (or vice versa). |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> scratch that, seems like we are (even though big users like rails |
| 11 |
> actively push users to 2.0; but that's probably not important |
| 12 |
> here) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
See: http://moving-innovations.com/~graaff/targets.svg |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Currently most ebuilds work with Ruby 1.9. Ruby 2.0 has already gained |
| 18 |
support, but most of these packages don't have a stable keyword. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Cheers, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Manuel |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTG1BaXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w |
| 28 |
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4MDA1RERERkM0ODM2QkE4MEY3NzY0N0M1 |
| 29 |
OEZCQTM2QzhEOUQ2MzVDAAoJEFj7o2yNnWNcFpMQALMptvzrEF1RS80cCXECG9P6 |
| 30 |
APTuB5/PCTUcy+wk8PnLkRb7c7B7nbfTEFyoWERlmTV9r6S3Ft1t5gtmO2mJ7U4F |
| 31 |
dWb7uOPCU95w24Sbbf4cRczESTkoImcuNweXWzvz3Azbkjj3OgX3KYc9Po7i+gli |
| 32 |
So9AQTePtbdxcx/Ep3nt53tF5Uz8t4tg++Fg0Zprl0qAITg436QuuXGFpb8K0GIG |
| 33 |
YgK9Nn3LjYnkjiNcpvTeqM3tCO2r0SVKgUiq9VIiYSTvGXf55lHSbxFPQPHYGPF3 |
| 34 |
/V3XUptdt0PWB9VYdeISpyRm4pfwt+2BzSoRpWmMH/C9EDSEvBdOchdMJWMoegNa |
| 35 |
U1yhalBsmWR7jG6eWDJNqyFlGmmFuCBWQyS/bNN/7hBLERrzhoFXBuQ9U6l1NSdL |
| 36 |
GIpV8MuavfaOjgAI3l9IqTC23J9hN2yuP+SUssfAXriP1Q1VU6ofZsEFWYnTVKYp |
| 37 |
h3QzcrU8UKmVIVnkN0WlsNBk3t79iCZ0MxhjEafS2pLAk04960pC/n/xExxxkWhD |
| 38 |
Om2hBle11Sc5nszogTicFcAAaYb7u03m6TVuoEF9dPLWgsGI7Om4THk4Q8mYPvny |
| 39 |
lDHRQMSQDI5UM++gJjfiCYCB8h4GMXw+f+EyHlsaALo7my5BiMlItrL9uOoYONNi |
| 40 |
vRIGhlsjU3CKdIxLct6Y |
| 41 |
=KXjh |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives
